Very easy to work and design, was happy with the timing in when it came in. My only problem was wishing if a design needed to be changed it could've been done immediately
Simple, elegant and inexpensive!
RayJ from MN wrote on April 06, 2015:
Was just what I expected. Simple and elegant. Not sure why it folds though?
I loved them
Jacquelyn from KY wrote on October 20, 2014:
This product was excellent. Very pretty and the quality was fantastic. I loved them very much.
I love them!
Kristen from MA wrote on June 26, 2014:
I gave it a 4 because I feel like the paper wasn't as good I was expecting but that was partly my fault because I didn't request a sample due to timing. But, I thought for the price it would be thicker. The thing that I really didn't like was the options on the RSVP card. I needed about three more lines. One for allergies would have been important.
calla lillie invitations are beautiful!!
mother of the bride from MA wrote on June 12, 2013:
service was excellent. While proofing the invitations I was able to call and speak with a person. Both times the person I spoke with was very helpful and very pleasant.
Good value for the price.
mother of the bride from NC wrote on December 03, 2012:
Was worried about keeping in the budget for my daughters wedding but wanted something elegant. These invitationswere perfect.
tj the tech queen from RI wrote on July 12, 2012:
So beautiful. I didn't realize that the invite folded in half though and the paper was a lot thinner than I would have liked.
White Heirloom Invitation
P from GA wrote on June 20, 2012:
The printing was poor quality. Some of the words were light, others were dark. Since the wedding was so close, we had to send them out as is, but I was NOT pleased with the quality of the printing.
Tracy from RI wrote on June 15, 2012:
I used these for my wedding invites. The are beautiful and the ink colors are spot on. We chose the two different purples and they are just lovely. I felt a little limited about the personalization options. There are really only two options for the font styles. I would have preferred at least three so we could have "reception to follow" in the same cursive as our names yet smaller. Also the card stock it was printed on was a lot thinner than I was expecting. It is only slightly heavier than regular printer paper. The invitation actually folds in half which makes it appear a little thicker, but I would have preferred it to just be the 5x7 in size on a heavier card stock and not fold in half. Other than that I love them!!! Everything else was great (response card, reception card, lined envelopes)
Ms B from IL wrote on May 29, 2012:
Every thing was nice. I just thought white heirloom was WHITE. The one other mistake I worked it in with the wedding. Over all I'm please & glad I use this company. Yes I'll refer this company.
Ms B from IL wrote on May 29, 2012:
Everything was beautiful. I just thought white heirloom was WHITE. The few mistakes I just worked them in the wedding.
Elegant and Simple = Beautiful
jvalo02 from TX wrote on March 05, 2012:
Our wedding invitation turned out just the way we wanted them to! The printing was beautiful and the paper was top quality. Envelopes even turned out great! We can not wait for our guests to get their invitations.
Simple and gorgeous
Kelly K from PA wrote on March 01, 2012:
The only problem with this product was that it was in a folded style (like a greeting card), and not only was this not made clear on the website, but it also didn't offer the option to have anything printed on the inside. What is the point of having a folded invitation if you can't print anything on the inside? Confusing. We requested to have them cut along the crease so there was no fold/they were single page, and they looked much better but were a little thinner than I would have preferred because of that. The reception and RSVP cards had the same problem (folded for no particular reason). Other than that very happy with the design!
Don't judge a book by it's cover
nighteyes from Wi wrote on February 27, 2012:
I was not very impressed. The invitation's embossing of the calla lily's was nice, BUT....I would have used regular flimsy card stock and printed it myself. It was NOT on white paper, but ivory, which was NOT what I expected. Also, the invitation is folded with no print in the inside. It says "above" that the invite is folded, so maybe it was my fault that I didnt see that in the catalog (I no longer have the catalog) I also didnt see an option for printing on the inside of the invite, which should have been an option since it is a folded invitation. I would have preferred a "white" invitation, no fold on a thicker paper stock. But, I guess I got what I paid for, as other invitations I have seen elsewhere are more expensive, and honestly, probably a better buy, if your NOT trying to save money.
Ashers from NV wrote on February 09, 2012:
I ordered these for my wedding. I loved them I just wish the color font didnt cost so much.
Happy and Engaged from CO wrote on February 04, 2012:
Samples came quickly and were very pretty. I didn't realize that I would be charged for a second proof (I thought revisions was part of the original proof fee). I ordered at 11:30 MST and the bill said I would get the 10% discount, but then I didn't. I emailed the customer service and they said I had missed it, but they would give it to me anyway. The invitations were just what I wanted. I wish the samples had come with envelopes so I would know what I was getting, but they were just what I was expecting.